Hello Joshua, Friday, June 28, 2002, 3:13:21 PM, you wrote:
JC> > Friends, whether and at you arose the following problem: JC> > JC> > By the same machine we have 2 different virtual sites; their files are JC> > located in different catalogues. JC> > JC> > In http.conf full freedom for .htaccess is given. JC> > JC> > Configuration Apache::ASP occurs through .htaccess #1 for a site #1 JC> > and .htaccess #2 for a site #2. JC> This is typical when modules of the same name are located JC> if different places, for example, for both sites the modules JC> used are: JC> use SiteConfig.pm Yes, absolutely right about same names of modules ! JC> Because the perl interpreter is shared globally across sites, JC> after site 1 module loads, site 2 will use it if it is JC> the same name. One way around this is to have all the JC> local site config data in the local global.asa. Another JC> is to have a per site naming convention like: JC> use Site1::Config.pm; JC> use Site2::Config.pm; JC> or other way around: JC> use Config::Site1; JC> use Config::Site2; Yes, will come to give different names to modules which carry out approximately identical functions on different sites. JC> It may be that this works if you subclass off a base class. JC> You can also consider more drastic measures like JC> MaxRequestsPerChild 1 JC> or doing a &CORE::exit(); in a Apache->register_cleanup() JC> to kill the process after executing. But this JC> might defeat much of the point of using mod_perl. I think, that in most cases such approach will be very inefficient. Many thanks! It is a pity, that there is no beautiful decision of such problem. Though, nevertheless exists is to use pure(clean) CGI. -- Best regards, Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
