Fabio,

Which aspect would you like to exclude? Which would you like to include? 
What symptoms, desirable or undesirable, are you getting?

>This aspect belongs to a hierarchy of aspects and pointcut of the
>abstract aspect is being linked on it. I want that pointcut either
>linked on to another aspect concrete. 
I am not sure I completely understand this. Are saying there is an 
abstract aspect which has an abstract pointcut (and presumably some 
associated advice) that is made concrete in two different concrete 
sub-aspects only one of which you wish to use?

Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester,  SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal) 
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/



Fábio Costa Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28/12/2006 16:01
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
[aspectj-users] loadtime weaving problem







I am trying to use load time weaving in the JBoss Application Server. It
is functioning, however he has a aspect that I would like to ignore.
This aspect belongs to a hierarchy of aspects and pointcut of the
abstract aspect is being linked on it. I want that pointcut either
linked on to another aspect concrete. 

This is the code that I tried in META-INF/aop.xml file:

<aop>

...
                 <aspect
name="aspects.dataManagement.persistent.DataCollectionPersistent" /> 



                                 <aspect

name="aspects.dataManagement.nonpersistent.DataCollectionNonPersistent" />

...

                                 <exclude
within="aspects.dataManagement.persistent.DataCollectionPersistent"/>

</aop>

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to