See the discussion on bugzilla bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
And enhancement request https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=113184 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincenz Braun Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type Fine, the missing word and a missing j did not made the post useless :-) (So args ha a instanceof semantic and one would expect aspectj not to match null values.) I think a lot of code depends on this "bug" and expects only runtime checks when narrowing the argument type. (e.g. args(.., SpecialRunnable). So this should be discussed with a broader audience. And I really want to know why there is no match with the pointcut David provided... Am 08.02.2007 um 15:49 schrieb Eric Bodden: > On 2/8/07, Vincenz Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So args ha a instanceof semantic and one would aspect null values >> not to match. >> Normally, with statically determinable pointcuts this is not the >> case in aspectj: > > I would be surprised if this was not a bug. Surely this cannot be > intentional. > > Eric > > -- > Eric Bodden > Sable Research Group > McGill University, Montréal, Canada > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
