Andy Clement wrote: > With code style aspects we can do more type checking than we can for > annotation style aspects - and there are some bugs related to > specification of parameters for around advice, when using annotation > style, that manifest as this kind of failure (StackOverflow) - when > code style would work perfectly. This is why when I saw your failure, > I assumed annotation style syntax. I'm using around advices. So the problem is that I probably have an ill defined pointcut?.
Thanks! saludos, -- santiago aguiar *netlabs* / Palmar 2548 Montevideo, Uruguay Tel. +(598 2) 707 7687 Fax. +(598 2) 709 4866 / http://www.netlabs.com.uy
begin:vcard fn:Santiago Aguiar n:Aguiar;Santiago org:;Desarrollo adr:;;Palmar 2548;Montevideo;Montevideo;11600;Uruguay email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:NetLabs tel;work:+598 2 7077687 tel;fax:+598 2 7094866 tel;home:+598 2 7075079 tel;cell:+598 99 579739 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.netlabs.com.uy/ version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
