Ron Bodkin wrote: > > That’s what I’d expect too although I’m surprised at the error as > reported: the method with the stack overflow isn’t in a new thread, so > why would increasing –Xmx avoid a stack overflow if stack is all > allocated up front? > I suspect that the reason the methods get called is related to some entries not being stored in the weak hash map because they were removed by the garbage collector (but I didn't have time nor source code to chase the bug).
However, what surprises me, is how is that some code gets 1024 method calls deep if it's not playing chess or something ;). saludos! -- santiago aguiar *netlabs* / Palmar 2548 Montevideo, Uruguay Tel. +(598 2) 707 7687 Fax. +(598 2) 709 4866 / http://www.netlabs.com.uy
begin:vcard fn:Santiago Aguiar n:Aguiar;Santiago org:;Desarrollo adr:;;Palmar 2548;Montevideo;Montevideo;11600;Uruguay email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:NetLabs tel;work:+598 2 7077687 tel;fax:+598 2 7094866 tel;home:+598 2 7075079 tel;cell:+598 99 579739 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.netlabs.com.uy/ version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
