Yep - raise a defect on that.
On 17/09/2007, Michael McCray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your help Andy. > > I tried moving my code to the same file, and I got my test case to > work by including the interface that I introduced as a parent to the > target class. It seems that if this is in another file it does not > work, should I file a defect? > > It seems odd to me that the ITD method is "within" the aspect as > opposed to the target of the introduction. I guess this makes sense > because it is declared in the same file as the aspect, but it could > make sense to me either way I guess. > > In the case of an interface with no methods, it might as well just be > declared in the aspect since there is no code to it. > > Thanks for your help, > Mike > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
