Wow, that was super quick! thanks, I'll look into it
On 05/11/2007, Bora Erbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An around advice which does not call proceed() would to it. > > On 11/5/07, Rob Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I'm completely new to AspectJ and was wondering if there is anyway to > cause > > a method to be "skipped" with AspectJ. > > > > Apologies if the question sounds silly, but I am using AspectJ to > monitor > > what is going on in an object for security purposes. > > > > If certain conditions have been met, a rule engine implemented in a > before > > advice determines that the code in that method should be skipped. > Naturally, > > for this to be in anyway feasible, the method in question would need not > to > > return anything, something like > > > > public void action() > > > > I guess I need something like a decorator pattern that removes > > functionality rather than adds it. The only way I can currently think do > to > > this is to use my aspect to change the value of a boolean variable in > the > > target method which causes the code to exit without doing anything. > > > > Really appreciate your help > > > > Thanks > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
