Specifically, you don't want to use "execution" pointcuts for these
packages, because AJ has to insert advice in them for "execution".
However, if you just care about advising your code that calls these
methods, then you can use "call" pointcuts.
dean
On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:02 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi
This also relates to the issue that AspectJ does not weave java.*
and javax.* in current release. See mail-thred titled "Weid problem
with javax.naming.InitialContext" for solution.
Hermod
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Sriram Gopal
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: SV: [aspectj-users] Load Time Weaving of dynamic proxies
public aspect ProxyAspect {
before: execution(* java.lang.reflect.Proxy+.*(..)){
System.out.println("Before executing method in proxy");
}
}
(Also tried different variations like specifying the name of generated
Proxy class explicitly, specifying InvocationHandler+ etc. instead of
java.lang.reflect.Proxy+ )
I tried a couple of approaches for doing the LTW.
Approach 1:
1. Created a jar containing the compilation of the aspect files. 2.
Set that in the ASPECTPATH env. variable and executed the application
Approach 2:
1. Created the aop.xml as below:
<aspectj>
<aspects>
<aspect name="ProxyAspect"/>
</aspects>
</aspectj>
and set its path in the classpath variable
2. Executed the compiled files using "aj" with the -javaagent option.
However, both these approaches failed to work.
On Jan 27, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Hermod Opstvedt wrote:
Hi
Your aop.xml and pointcuts please
Hermod
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Sriram Gopal
Sendt: 27. januar 2008 22:31
Til: [email protected]
Emne: [aspectj-users] Load Time Weaving of dynamic proxies
Please let me know if someone has tried to do Load Time Weaving
(LTW) of
dynamic proxies. I tried creating a .jar containing the .aj file and
set its
path in the ASPECTPATH variable prior to running the application
using the
"aj" script. Using this approach, I am able to do LTW of normal
classes but
not a dynamic proxy. Let me know if I am doing something wrong.
Thanks,
Sriram
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * *
This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that the DnB
NOR Group
cannot accept any payment orders or other legally binding
correspondence with
customers as a part of an email.
This email message has been virus checked by the anti virus programs
used
in the DnB NOR Group.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * *
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Dean Wampler, Ph.D.
dean at objectmentor.com
http://www.objectmentor.com
See also:
http://www.aspectprogramming.com AOP advocacy site
http://aquarium.rubyforge.org AOP for Ruby
http://www.contract4j.org Design by Contract for Java5
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
