The logs date is 20080511215715 and the build date is 20080510020449 so on this occasion the build machine has gone bad - uploading the changes list but not the build with the fix in. Wait for a build dated after the bug was closed, should be later today.
Andy. 2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thank you for the quick fix, however, seeing from the logs the current build > *should* have the fix included, but as I try to compile the code with the > new libraries, it does not work. > > Maybe somebody broke just after you fixed it? > > Mark > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Andy Clement" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 4:06 AM > > > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects > > > > Fixed just now as https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=231478 > > . Fix will be in next dev build of AspectJ. > > > > You may find other issues as you head into this area, do feel free to > > raise bugzilla entries for anything you encounter. > > > > cheers, > > Andy. > > > > 2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Ok, thank you for your fast reply. I hope it can be fixed soon, as it > would > > > be useful for me.. then again.. you are probably already busy enough :) > > > > > > Just for the sake of completeness, here is a (not so much) working test > > > case: > > > > > > > > > /* Error message: Type B does not meet the specification for type > parameter > > > 1 (A extends Base) in generic type GenericAspectA */ > > > abstract aspect GenericAspectA<A extends Base> {} > > > abstract aspect GenericAspectB<B extends SubBase> extends > GenericAspectA<B> > > > {} > > > > > > /* Base extends SubBase extends SubSubBase */ > > > class Base {} > > > class SubBase extends Base {} > > > class SubSubBase extends SubBase {} > > > > > > /* Plain Java implementation */ > > > class GenericA<A extends Base> {} > > > class GenericB<B extends SubBase> extends GenericA<B> {} > > > > > > > > > Good luck! > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > From: "Andy Clement" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 8:55 PM > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > > > The docs only say ( > > > > > > > > http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/generics-inAspectJ5.html > > > > ): > > > > > > > > > > > > > AspectJ 5 allows an abstract aspect to be declared as a generic > type. > > > Any concrete aspect extending a generic abstract aspect must extend a > > > parameterized version of the abstract aspect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That page of the doc also shows some examples of a hierarchy of > > > > abstract generic aspects, although none of them alter the bounds in > > > > the way your example does. So the fact that your code won't compile > > > > is a bug that needs fixing. > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > Andy. > > > > > > > > 2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > First of all, I know this is not possible, as it says on the manual > > > page.. > > > > > but I was wondering why.. > > > > > In plain Java you can redefine the upperbound of a type parameter, > > > i.e.: > > > > > > > > > > class AbstractComponent<C extends Component> {} > > > > > class AbstractWindow<W extends Window> extends AbstractComponent<W> > > > {} > > > > > > > > > > Now.. trying the same thing with aspects.. does not work: > > > > > > > > > > abstract aspect AbstractComponentA<C extends Component> {} > > > > > abstract aspect AbstractWindowA<W extends Window> extends > > > > > AbstractComponentA<W> {} > > > > > > > > > > So.. my question, why isn't this supported? And what would be the > > > "best" > > > > > workaround? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > Mark > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > aspectj-users mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aspectj-users mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aspectj-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
