I am writing a library, so I typically write aspects as public. I can't seem to find any mentioning of this restriction from the doc. If I remove "privileged", it is fine.
Andy, do you have some clues? Thanks, Charles ----- Original Message ---- From: Eric Bodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 1:05:27 AM Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] privileged generic aspect Could the "public" be the problem? What meaning would "public" have? Eric 2008/6/3 Charles Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > public privileged aspect Test<T> { > > } > > I get a parsing error on this. But I can't find in the doc. why this is > disallowed. Can I have generic privileged aspects? > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > -- Eric Bodden Sable Research Group McGill University, Montréal, Canada _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
