I'm afraid that isn't possible right now. We do support an optimized implementation of if() pcds that only builds thisJoinPoint if the if() condition succeeds but if() can only use static information. (I'm talking code style here rather than annotation style). I have thought about improving that if() optimization for certain other situations but haven't had the time to look into it yet - you could raise an enhancement request where we could discuss it further in that. Possibly I had been thinking about exposing the aspect instance for use in the if(), maybe that plus a perthis() instantiation model would help your situation.
Andy. 2008/7/3 Marijn Meijles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > I have a problem with my around advice. The advice itself is really slow > because it does all kind of reflection stuff and needs access to this (the > current aspected instance). However, it should only run about 1% of the time > and that depends on the return value of a getter on this. Now my question > is: how do I tell AspectJ to only run the advice and do all kinds of time > consuming stuff if the value from the getter is not null? > > I tried a pointcut with "... && this(entity) && if()" whereby the method > body returns "entity.getParent() != null" but this doesn't help, probably > because the ProceedingJoinPoint is created for the @Pointcut method as well. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > -- > Marijn > --- > This line says this line says > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
