2008/7/25 Larry Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This excerpt from the AspectJ 5 Developer's Notebook, "It's very > important to preserve the same semantics between the code style and the > annotation style," which is implying that the semantics are the same is > just misleading, because the semantics are indeed quite different. >
I agree that is misleading. Although we want to have identical semantics there are places where it is just not possible and mixins were added as a kind of best-can-do for AspectJ intertype declarations. There may still be places where mixins can be tweaked to bring them more inline with what is possible for ITDs (they haven't had a lot of work done on them) but at the very least the doc needs updating to detail the difference in semantics in this area, I just haven't had the time. cheers, Andy.
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
