The bug is marked '[plan]' so I do plan to look at fixing it shortly -
before 1.6.3 ships (in December).  I don't know of another workaround (or
even if your situation matches that mentioned in the bug report - might be
worth you adding a comment and getting on cc of that bug for when I update
it).

Andy.

2008/11/11 rmahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
> There is any way to workaround. I tried the workaround given in
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=154427
> but it doesnt work for me.
>
>
> Andy Clement wrote:
> >
> > looks like this bug:
> >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=154427
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > 2008/11/10 rmahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I used the following pointcut to advice ejb remove method
> >>
> >> public pointcut ejbRemove() : call(public void
> >> javax.ejb.EJBObject+.remove(..));
> >>
> >> in my around advice
> >>
> >> void around() : ejbRemove() {
> >>                Object targetObject = thisJoinPoint.getTarget();
> >>                MethodSignature methodSignature =
> >> (MethodSignature)thisJoinPoint.getSignature();
> >>                Method method =  methodSignature.getMethod();
> >>        ...............
> >> }
> >>
> >> why Method method =  methodSignature.getMethod(); always returns null?
> >>
> >> methodSignature.getMethod() works fine for all other ejb Calls.
> >>
> >> Can anybody tell me why it happens?
> >>
> >> Thanx
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Why-problem-with-Ejb.remove%28%29--tp20422432p20422432.html
> >> Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aspectj-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Why-problem-with-Ejb.remove%28%29--tp20422432p20435428.html
> Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to