I think we should do some minimal level of analysis for constants. Raised as: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=266165
Andy. 2009/2/25 Neale Upstone <[email protected]> > Thanks Bruno, that's working perfectly. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruno > > De Fraine > > Sent: 25 February 2009 12:01 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] if(ENABLED) causes weave for constant > > > > On 25 Feb 2009, at 11:45, Neale Upstone wrote: > > > > > For some development/debugging aspects, I want to be able > > to switch > > > them > > > on and off and cause the weaver to ignore them. > > > > You can try the following: > > > > pointcut fail(); > > pointcut isEnabled(): !fail(); // Remove "!" to disable > > > > before() : publicCalls() && isEnabled() > > { > > ... > > } > > > > >> From a weaving efficiency point of view, wouldn't it be better to > > >> detect > > > that if() has been passed a constant and for the pointcut > > > "publicCalls() > > > && if(ENABLED)" to apply to no joinpoints? > > > > > > Unlike Java, it seems that AspectJ delays all if-tests until > > runtime. > > However, I believe the research on SCoPE uses partial evaluation > > techniques to optimize this and many other if-tests, see: > > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1218582 > > > > Best regards, > > Bruno > > > > -- > > Bruno De Fraine > > Vrije Universiteit Brussel > > Faculty of Applied Sciences, DINF - SSEL > > Room 4K208, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels > > tel: +32 (0)2 629 29 75 > > fax: +32 (0)2 629 28 70 > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > ********************************************************************** > IMPORTANT NOTICE. > Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the > above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error > you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to > anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. > Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the > knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. > We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when > e-mailing us. > Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and > attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good > computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. > Monitoring and Scanning: Cambridge Cognition has monitoring and scanning > systems in place in relation to emails sent and received to: monitor / > record business communications; prevent and detect crime; investigate the > use of the Company's internal and external email system; and provide > evidence of compliance with business practices. > > Cambridge Cognition Limited > Company Registration Number 4338746 > Registered address: > Tunbridge Court > Tunbridge Lane > Bottisham > Cambridge > CB25 9TU > UK > ********************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
