This is the expected behavior. For an execution join point, there is no
lexical enclosing join point, hence it is the same as
thisJoinPointStaticPart.
-Ramnivas

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:11 AM, <[email protected]>wrote:

>  I misunderstand the returns of ( I construct a StringBuffer)  :
>
>
>
> append(*thisJoinPointStaticPart*
> .getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName()).append(".").append(*
> thisJoinPointStaticPart*.getSignature().getName())
>
> and
>
> append(*thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart*
> .getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName()).append(".").append(*
> thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart*.getSignature().getName())
>
>
>
> that are the same with and execution pointcut ( a call pointcut gives the
> parent of the called method).
>
>
>
> Is it normal ? or *thisEnclosingJoinPointStaticPart *has no effect with an
> execution pointcut?
>
>
>
> Cordialement / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Jean-Louis Pasturel*
> jeanlouis.pastu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>  *********************************
> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
> intended solely for the addressees.
> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
> Messages are susceptible to alteration.
> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered,
> changed or falsified.
> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it
> immediately and inform the sender.
> ********************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to