Bug filed. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288713
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>wrote: > I didn't answer this earlier because I am not sure what the specified > behavior should be. There are many subtle differences between code style > and annotation style behavior and this appears to be one of them. In > general, we want the behavior for the two syntaxes to be as close as > possible, so there is a good argument that this is a bug. > > I'd recommend that you raise a bug for this and we can think about whether > or not it makes sense to change the behavior. > > 2009/9/1 João Gonçalves <[email protected]> > >> Greetings, >> >> I'm having problems with the "translation" of the following inter-type >> declaration to the new @AspectJ notation: >> >> *private* String FigureElement.enclosingGroup = *null*; >> >> >> I'm working with the following hierarchy: >> >> *interface* FigureElement >> *class* Group *implements* FigureElement >> >> >> I've declared the following interface: >> >> *public interface* FigureEnclosingGroup { >> String getFigureEnclosingGroup(); >> *void* setFigureEnclosingGroup(String enclosingGroup); >> } >> >> >> I've also defined a simple implementation class *FigureEnclosingGroupImpl >> *. >> >> The @DeclareParents code I'm using is: >> >> @DeclareParents(value="FigureElement", >> defaultImpl=FigureEnclosingGroupImpl.*class*) >> *private* FigureEnclosingGroup figureEnclosingGroup; >> >> >> However, when I cast a Group element to FigureElement and try to access >> the getFigureEnclosingGroup() method, I get the following exception: >> >> java.lang.AbstractMethodError: >> Group.getFigureEnclosingGroup()Lfigures/Group >> >> That is, the method is not found. >> >> HOWEVER, if in the @DeclareParents' value attribute I use "FigureElement* >> +*" (notice the plus sign), everything runs without errors (and well)... >> >> >> Is this the normal behaviour? In the first @DeclareParents was I just >> stating that the implementation would affect only the interface and not the >> classes that implement it!? Must I use the plus sign with @DeclareMixinas >> well? >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
