I can't recall the entire way that structure model works right now. Why not walk the model and ask which types are aspects? Surely that will work? I might even take a patch to change the structure model to provide what you need if you change it to be how you would like it to be.
cheers, Andy 2009/11/25 Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>: >> However the interesting part, the map containing all types is a private >> member, and I dont see how the different methods allow me to get a hold of >> all the types. > Reflection is not evil. :-) But I'll let Andy get back to you on a > more friendly way of getting that information. > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
