> > BTW: What are the plans, if any, to update the AspectJ compiler to a > newer > > upstream JDT compiler version? > > Not currently on the radar as I only get about 1 bug every couple of > years that is due to a fix I'm missing from JDT - you were unlucky to > be the one in the first thing you tried :)
Well, there seems to be another bug related to generics that I hit. The original code compiled fine in Eclipse 3.5.2, but not so with AJDT. Will try to isolate the problem into a small test case. > I will likely do it when I create the 3 language compiler for > groovy/java/aspectj. That is a commonly voted on issue in bugzilla. > > Do you have some requirement that means I should look at it sooner? Well, I encountered some bugs related to compiling plain Java code which were fixed in later versions of the JDT compiler. If I suggest to management to go with AspectJ there may be some questions raised about versions, compatibility, and stability. If I could tell them that there were some bugs that were fixed amazingly fast, but that an update to a supposedly more stable upstream JDT compiler is under way, I could probably more easily pacify their concerns. But other than that, I'm still astonished how fast those two bugs were fixed! Martin _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
