I can only assume it is the way you are building it. I took your pieces and did as follows and it worked for me:
javac CallJava.java -d output scalac CallScala.scala -d output ajc -inpath output TestAspect.aj -showWeaveInfo Join point 'method-execution(void CallScala.call())' in Type 'CallScala' (CallScala.scala:3) advised by before advice from 'TestAspect' (TestAspect.aj:2) Join point 'method-execution(void CallJava.call())' in Type 'CallJava' (CallJava.java:3) advised by before advice from 'TestAspect'(TestAspect.aj:2) scalac Test.scala java -classpath "\scala-2.8.0.final\lib\scala-library.jar;..\lib\aspectjrt.jar;." Test Start application Before call aspect !! Scala called Before call aspect !! Java called Andy On 26 October 2010 06:57, Romain <romain.reuil...@iscpif.fr> wrote: > (...I figured this message was posted to the wrong list [ajdt-dev] so I > repost it here, sorry if you receive that multiple times....) > > Hi all, > > I am having a problem using scala and aspectj together with static > weaving (compile time weaving). > > You will find a test project illustrating my point in attachment. To > execute it: > > mvn install > cd scala > mvn assembly:assembly > java -jar target/scala-1.0-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar > > Result is: > > Start application > Scala called > Before call aspect !! > Java called > > The "Before call aspect !!" is not executed before the call of the scala > method. > > The aspect is very simple: > > public aspect TestAspect { > before() : execution(* *(..)) { > System.out.println("Before call aspect !!"); > } > } > > And the java class and scala class too: > public class CallJava { > public void call() { > System.out.println("Java called"); > } > } > > class CallScala { > def call() = { > println("Scala called") > } > } > > > And last, the main: > > object Test { > def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { > println("Start application") > > val call = new CallScala > call.call > > val callJ = new CallJava > callJ.call > } > } > > Do you have any idea why my aspect works with fine with java, but don't > with scala? > > cheers, > Romain > > > > _______________________________________________ > ajdt-dev mailing list > ajdt-...@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users