Done: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=335810
Best regards,
Emond
On Friday 28 January 2011 17:55:44 Andy Clement wrote:
> Hi Emond,
>
> Can you raise an AspectJ bugzilla for that? AspectJ is not currently
> based on the eclipse 3.6 compiler (although of course it works fine in
> 3.6) - hence the difference.
>
> Andy
>
> On 28 January 2011 06:53, Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@topicus.nl>
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Starting with Eclipse 3.6, the Eclipse compiler no longer suppresses raw
> > type warnings with @SuppressWarnings("unchecked"). You need to use
> > @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") for that. Is it possible to change this in
> > the AspectJ compiler as well?
> >
> > At our company, we have several libraries shared between projects. Some
> > of these projects use AspectJ, where others are still plain Java to
> > compile these libraries. The current behavior makes it impossible to
> > suppress raw type warnings in both compilers: with 'unchecked', Eclipse
> > 3.6 will complain about raw types and with 'rawtypes', AJDT complains
> > about an unknown
> > SuppressWarnings token.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Emond
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
