Hi, Please raise a bugzilla for this improvement: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ
cheers, Andy On 2 September 2011 04:13, Maik Jablonski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > some time ago there was a bug report about slow performance with > @annotation on method level: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=296484 > > I want to report a similar issue with the @annotation on field access level. > > Using something like the following advice which captures the use of a > @Bind-annotation on field set access results in poor performance: > > Object around(Object host, Bind bind, Object newGuest) > : set(@Bind !java.util.Collection+ *.*) > && this(host) && args(newGuest) && @annotation(bind) > { > // ... > return proceed(host, bind, newGuest); > } > > A workaround similar to the one descirbed in the bug reports performs > much better: > > Object around(Object host, Object newGuest) > : set(@Bind !java.util.Collection+ *.*) > && this(host) && args(newGuest) > { > Bind bind = ((FieldSignature) > thisJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature()).getField().getAnnotation(Bind.class); > // ... > return proceed(host, newGuest); > } > > HTH, Maik > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
