Ok. I am happy to write test code or any other thing after the researchers are done with it. :-)
Mohan On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Mohan, > > There is no activity on this at the moment but it is coming onto the > radar. The language changes coming in Java 8 may be the biggest things > AspectJ has tackled for a while - the invokedynamic that arrived in Java7 > was just 'tolerated' in AspectJ7 and no real attempts have been made to > exploit it in code gen or recognize it as a join point. I know some > researchers who work with AspectJ and I was hoping to get them to help me > define the AspectJ semantics around lambdas/closures, whatever they might > be. As the real work items appear I'll mention them on the list. Any > design decisions we are making can hopefully be publicly discussed to > collect feedback. Probably the first real efforts will happen once Eclipse > JDT provides Java 8 compilation and AspectJ can pick that up. > > cheers, > Andy > > > On 10 January 2013 18:30, Mohan Radhakrishnan < > radhakrishnan.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Is there a particular task or support activity required for >> supporting lambdas in aspectj at this time ? The other thread "Selecting >> arithmetic operation join points. Is it possible?" seemed to indicate that >> this is a high priority task. >> >> Thanks, >> Mohan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
