Looks like a bug to me. Can you raise at:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ - it should be
consistent. However, from the docs:
"Using the code style, types referenced in pointcut expressions are
resolved with respect to the imported types in the compilation unit. When
using the annotation style, types referenced in pointcut expressions are
resolved in the absence of any imports and so have to be fully qualified if
they are not by default visible to the declaring type (outside of the
declaring package and java.lang ). This does not apply to type patterns
with wildcards, which are always resolved in a global scope."
So if Account is in a package you should always be qualifying it in
annotation style - you seem to be getting away with not doing that. The
import information is not stored in the class file and so the weaver can't
see what it was when unpicking the strings.
Andy
On 12 February 2013 01:00, ccol002 <chriscol...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am using AspectJ annotations and for some reason it seems that the
> resolution scope of pointcuts differs for a named pointcut versus an
> anonymous pointcut.
>
> For example in the code below an identical pointcut is resolved if
> anonymous
> but not when it is named. The named pointcut will however match if I use a
> wildcard instead of a specific type or if the aspect is moved to the same
> package as the Account class.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> import ... .Account;
>
> @Aspect
> public class MyClass {
>
>
> //this does not match... but matches if Account is replaced by *
> @Pointcut("execution(* Account.withdraw(..)) && args(amount)")
> public void withdr(double amount){}
>
> @Before("withdr(amount)")
> public void dosomething1(double amount){}
>
>
> //this matches
> @Before("execution(* Account.withdraw(..)) && args(amount)")
> public void dosomthing2(double amount){}
>
> }
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Different-resolution-scope-for-Named-and-Anonymous-pointcut-annotations-tp4650774.html
> Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
