On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hmmm, I had to fix up some of your sample code there as it doesn't > actually work as it is. (Is Go an annotation or an aspect - you've used it > as both...) > > Sorry for the "Go" confusion. I was giving the shape of the problem and needed an annotation to drive the aspect and didn't realize that name collision. > I changed it to this: > ... [snip] ... > That looks correct. > Compiles and runs fine for me: > > > ajc -1.5 *.java -showWeaveInfo > Type 'GoA$I' (GoA.java) has intertyped method from 'GoA' (GoA.java:'void > GoA$I.go()') > Extending interface set for type 'Foo' (Foo.java) to include 'GoA$I' > (GoA.java) > > > java TestFoo > go > > As we discussed a little the other day. An ITD on an interface is > considered a 'default implementation' as the implementation a class will > get that implements the interface if it does not provide its own. > > Agreed, as I understood. > > If I could recreate your problem I could investigate... > > I'm seeing this in my real codebase. I gave repro steps for the codebase you have access to at https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=404601. Note that it's on a branch called "ajc-404601". The exception is still reproducible for me (JDK 1.6). I'd appreciate a look. I'll review what I'm doing to ensure that I've correctly reflected the shape of the problem as well. -matthew -- mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me <matt...@matthewadams.me> skype:matthewadams12 googletalk:matt...@matthewadams.me http://matthewadams.me http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
