As we kind of chatted about earlier on Skype, I don't think you can do this
right now. The support for annotation array values isn't all in place and
even then the support for class literal annotation values isn't all there
either. There is so much to annotations that the various use cases are
addressed as they come up. You seem to have come up with this one so it is
time to look at filling it in.
The syntax for matching one element of an array value is probably something
like you propose:
declare parents: (@Gimme(value = {..,Serializable.class,..}) *) implements
Serializable;
even though I don't really like the look of it.
But perhaps a syntax sugared variant of:
declare parents: (@Gimme(value = Serializable.class) *) implements
Serializable;
would be OK for a single value being located, even though strictly speaking
'=' is wrong and it should be something that suggests 'contains/includes'.
(I'm open to suggestions).
cheers,
Andy
On 5 April 2013 09:21, Matthew Adams <matt...@matthewadams.me> wrote:
> Dunno. I used Nabble's "raw" tags. I'll reply to original post without
> them.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Matching-on-one-of-an-annotation-s-values-in-a-multivalued-property-tp4650839p4650841.html
> Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
