1.6.13 with this change in is now on the download page: http://eclipse.org/aspectj/downloads.php
Andy On 25 April 2013 12:17, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Good catch. There is a license checker job that runs as part of the > regression suite but it doesn't test the bcel classes as they currently are > considered a separately built and packaged module. > > > Q: If aspectjweaver's constantPool.java uses Apache BCEL code, which > version of Apache BCEL (5.0, 5.1, 5.2) does it refer? > > 5.1 - as per the readme in the bcel-builder project. > > I will stick the license file in and it will respin some versions when I > get some time. > > cheers, > Andy > > On 24 April 2013 17:37, ohira-ryoji <ryoji-oh...@exa-corp.co.jp> wrote: > >> From our source check, we found No License text found in latest >> org.aspectj.apache.bcel.classfile.ConstantPool.java source. >> This can lead us to *license related issues* using aspectjweaver. >> >> Let me ask one question related to this issue.. >> Q: If aspectjweaver's constantPool.java uses Apache BCEL code, which >> version >> of Apache BCEL (5.0, 5.1, 5.2) does it refer? >> >> If it refers ver5.0 or ver5.1 in ApacheSoftwareLicense(ASL)1.1, we request >> the next 2 actions. >> >> 1- Add license text in org.aspectj.apache.bcel.classfile.ConstantPool. >> >> 2- With the above text added, please commit aspeactjweaver6's version from >> 1.6.12 to 1.6.13. >> >> At the same time commit spectjweaver7's version from 1.7.2 to 1.7.3. >> >> (FYI) Here is the situation we are facing.: >> >> We are developing web application using AspectJ. >> One of our company section checked the OpenSource license with the >> following >> feedback. >> >> 1.ConstantPool.java *seems to be coded based on* Apache BCEL(Version5.0) >> code. >> (Class comment are almost same. Method name and process look similar) >> >> 2.Apache BCEL(Version5.0) is ASL1.1 license and license article must be >> stated if using. >> >> 3.No license text found after AspectJ version1.6.1 of ConstantPool.java. >> >> For these reasons we judged Aspectj that includes aspectjweaver cannot be >> used. >> We also have concern that all other projects using Aspectj may face the >> same >> problem. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/License-related-issues-in-aspectjweaver-s-ConstantPool-java-tp4650903.html >> Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
