When I worked at IBM I think existence of that patent came up once or twice but nothing ever came of it. I don't recall any instances where its existence affected teams making decisions about using AspectJ or other AOP techniques, I don't remember anyone asking permission because of it. (Of course, IANAL either) :)
cheers, Andy On 23 March 2014 06:00, Muhammad Adinata <mail.die...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just found this patent when crawling around the web: > http://www.google.com/patents/US6467086 > > Basically it's define what is Aspect Oriented Programming. Does that > patent meant if we want to use Aspect concept in our development (or > AspectJ), meant we need to ask permission because of the patent? > > I have no idea about patent, so sorry for this random question. > > > Thanks, > -- > *Adinata* > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users