When I worked at IBM I think existence of that patent came up once or twice
but nothing ever came of it. I don't recall any instances where its
existence affected teams making decisions about using AspectJ or other AOP
techniques, I don't remember anyone asking permission because of it. (Of
course, IANAL either) :)

cheers,
Andy


On 23 March 2014 06:00, Muhammad Adinata <mail.die...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just found this patent when crawling around the web:
> http://www.google.com/patents/US6467086
>
> Basically it's define what is Aspect Oriented Programming. Does that
> patent meant if we want to use Aspect concept in our development (or
> AspectJ), meant we need to ask permission because of the patent?
>
> I have no idea about patent, so sorry for this random question.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> *Adinata*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to