An afterthought: As for Signature.getDeclaringTypeName(), the acceptance
criteria do not seem to involve
> Am 23.05.2014 um 00:55 schrieb "Alexander Kriegisch"
> <alexan...@kriegisch.name>:
>
> Okay, so you had the same thoughts ('if' pointcut and stacktrace check) as I
> and also the same results. We would need something like a sneek peek towards
> method resolution which happens just an instant later, but not quite at the
> call site.
>
> BTW, this was one of my experimental pointcuts:
>
> pointcut jdkType() :
> if(thisJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName().startsWith("java."));
>
> But for the reasons I mentioned on StackOverflow this does not (and cannot)
> work reliably for two out of four cases.
>
> Thank you anyway :-)
> --
> Alexander Kriegisch
> http://scrum-master.de
>
>
> Andy Clement schrieb am 23.05.2014 00:48:
>
>> I can't immediately think of a way to do that. Even if using an if() clause
>> on the point cut to insert a runtime test, that test can't tell whose method
>> is running on the object you have (whether it is a local one or an inherited
>> one). You can't even inspect the stack trace in the advice (which would be
>> crude anyway) because the advice invocation is made at the call site before
>> you enter the method in question.
>>
>> Incidentally I am probably going to be hanging around on stack overflow more
>> these days so anyone posting questions here, feel free to start posting
>> there, I will see them :)
>>
>>
>>> On 22 May 2014 00:59, Alexander Kriegisch <alexan...@kriegisch.name
>>> <mailto:alexan...@kriegisch.name> > wrote:
>>> On StackOverflow I saw an interesting question. Even though I (user
>>> kriegaex) have answered it as good as I could at
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23791760/aspectj-separating-native-library-calls-from-application-calls/23799457#23799457
>>>
>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23791760/aspectj-separating-native-library-calls-from-application-calls/23799457#23799457>
>>> ,
>>> I am still wondering if there might be a way to find out which method a
>>> call really resolves to later in all of the four cases mentioned there,
>>> because in general a call joinpoint's signature is not necessarily equal
>>> to what gets executed later.
>>>
>>> I don't know if anyone can answer that, but my best guess would be Andy
>>> Clement (as usual). ;-)
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
