I think this is not possible. But maybe Andy Clement knows better. It would not be the first time he surprised me. Meanwhile, check out my workaround at http://stackoverflow.com/a/24797868/1082681.
-- Alexander Kriegisch http://scrum-master.de Eric B schrieb am 17.07.2014 07:12: > Thanks. What if want to advise based on an annotation rather than a type? I > tried > > pointcut addEntity(@MyAnnotation * s): > call( * java.util.Collection+.add( * )) > && args(s); > > But got syntax error that @MyAnnotation is not allowed. > > > On Jul 17, 2014 1:05 AM, "Ulises Juárez Martínez" <ujuare...@gmail.com > <mailto:ujuare...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> add() signature is: >> >> add(E e) >> >> Thus, * matches anything, but java.lang.String is not E. >> >> Change your pointcut to: >> >> pointcut addEntity(String s): >> call( * java.util.Collection+.add( * )) >> && args(s); >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Eric B <ebenza...@gmail.com >> <mailto:ebenza...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> > I'm trying to write a pointcut against a Collection.add() method given a >> > specific type of argument, but everytime I specify the argument type the >> > pointcut fails to advise. >> > >> > Given the following code: >> > List<String> x = new ArrayList<String>(); >> > x.add("Some String)"; >> > >> > This works: >> > >> > pointcut addEntity(): call( * java.util.Collection+.add( * )); >> > >> > However, this does not: >> > >> > pointcut addEntity(): call( * java.util.Collection+.add( java.util.String >> > )); >> > >> > >> > Is there a specific reason why I cannot specify the type of argument I want >> > to advise against? _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
