That SO question is what inspired my post the other day about how should an invokedynamic instruction manifest as a joinpoint (which had no replies) - trying to get into how to support lambda matching. The fact that he needs to change his pointcut is horrible.
I haven’t raised an issue for it yet (feel free). Nothing has been done to handle invokedynamic or the lambda generated methods in a special way but there is some infrastructure in place that would help support it. cheers, Andy > On Jun 28, 2015, at 2:29 AM, Alexander Kriegisch <alexan...@kriegisch.name> > wrote: > > Hi Andy! > > Would you please take a look at http://stackoverflow.com/q/30776675/1082681 > and my (kriegaex) answer there? Is this issue something which can be improved > in AspectJ? Should I create a ticket? BTW, the result is the same, regardless > of whether I use AspectJ 1.8.6 or the new developer snapshot based on Eclipse > Mars. > > Regards > -- > Alexander Kriegisch > http://scrum-master.de > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users