Understood, Andy. Should I create an issue so that we can track this? > On May 14, 2019, at 10:14 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would probably need to see a lot of demand before exploring an ajc like > experience for Kotlin. It would be a very large amount of effort and binary > weaving of the class files can get you a long way. If I had cycles to work on > the compile time experience I'd probably prefer to put that into improving > the annotation based model, but I know that isn't great for folks relying on > inter type declarations and static checking at compile time. > > cheers, > Andy > > On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 06:46, Matthew Adams <matt...@matthewadams.me > <mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me>> wrote: > No, Martin, I’m not experiencing these problems, and my mentioning Spring was > tangential. > > I’m basically asking that ajc support Kotlin source files. > >> On May 13, 2019, at 5:43 PM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com >> <mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com>> wrote: >> >> from what i see its not a matter of spring like or dislike..its a matter of >> keeping JDK class file consist >> >> aj => .java => .class >> >> kt => .java => .class >> >> but this same scenario goes fubar when you switch JDKs ..this is an example >> >> aj => 1_dot_eight.java => 1_dot_eight.class >> >> kt => 1_dot_nine.java => 1_dot_none.class >> >> because spring is native compiled to 1.8 class format ..all .aj and all .kt >> dsl files will compile to 1.8 class >> access to class files in jar is no problem >> doing reflection e.g. Class.forName(One_dot_eight); also no problem >> >> things fall apart quickly with aj, kt or .java files when you mix 1.8 class >> files with 1.9 class files >> >> (1.9 lambda functions fubar on accessing 1.8 class files) >> >> maven folk say full compile the whole lot to your runtime JDK will >> supposedly cure this scenario >> >> is this what you're experiencing? >> >> martin- >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations >> >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file >> >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file> >> >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file> >> >> How to convert a kotlin source file to a java source file - Stack Overflow - >> Stack Overflow - Where Developers Learn, Share, & Build Careers >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file> >> To convert a Kotlin source file to a Java source file you need to (when you >> in Android Studio):. Press Cmd-Shift-A on a Mac, or press Ctrl-Shift-A on a >> Windows machine.. Type the action you're looking for: Kotlin Bytecode and >> choose Show Kotlin Bytecode from menu. Press Decompile button on the top of >> Kotlin Bytecode panel.; Now you get a Decompiled Java file along with Kotlin >> file in a ... >> stackoverflow.com <http://stackoverflow.com/> >> >> >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations> >> >> aop - Convert Inter-Type declaraton from .aj to .java with Aspect >> annotations - Stack Overflow - Stack Overflow - Where Developers Learn, >> Share, & Build Careers >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations> >> What you want is not possible with @AspectJ style, you need to use the more >> powerful native syntax. (Why do you want to switch anyway?) The reason >> behind this is that the Java compiler can only convert @DeclareParents to a >> form in which Village is a subclass of whatever interface implementation you >> define in your aspect, for example something like this: >> stackoverflow.com <http://stackoverflow.com/> >> >> From: aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org >> <mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org> >> <aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org >> <mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org>> on behalf of Matthew Adams >> <matt...@matthewadams.me <mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me>> >> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 5:53 PM >> To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org <mailto:aspectj-users@eclipse.org> >> Subject: [aspectj-users] Formal support for Kotlin? >> >> Hi all, >> >> I’ve been doing some googling around to see what I can find with regard to >> using AspectJ with Kotlin. Things don’t look particularly great at first >> glance: >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44364633/aspectj-doesnt-work-with-kotlin >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44364633/aspectj-doesnt-work-with-kotlin> >> >> There are of course many more hits, but it appears the current state of the >> art is to compile with kotlin, then apply AspectJ to the kotlin .class files. >> >> Problem is, we have some libraries that we can only compile via ajc due to >> their design, so I’m wondering what thought has been given to adding kotlin >> language support to ajc. I didn’t see any issues requesting Kotlin language >> support in ajc so far. Kotlin looks promising, and it appears that Spring >> also is liking Kotlin enough to add support for it. I’d love to have my >> Kotlin & AspectJ, too. >> >> Any comments, folks? >> >> -matthew >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org <mailto:aspectj-users@eclipse.org> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from >> this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users> > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org <mailto:aspectj-users@eclipse.org> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>_______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
