Hi Kevin, on Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Those names are there so the user can specify a dictionary directly. I > > just committed a patch for support for multi files with the ".alias" > > extension. Aspell will recognize files with this extension as valid multi > > dictionary files when specified directly (with or with out the extension) > > but will not pick them up when listing available dictionaries. I'm happy with these changes, but I was wondering if, in the case where the regionless .multi file is equivalent to a region .multi file, it would not be more consistent to rename that regionless .multi file into an alias? E.g.: cat fr-40.multi # Generated with Aspell Dicts "proc" script version 0.12 add fr_FR-40.multi shouldn't fr-60.multi be renamed fr-60.alias? Because now it lists: fr-40 fr-60 fr-80 fr_CH-40 fr_CH-60 fr_CH-80 fr_FR-40 fr_FR-60 fr_FR-80 whereas actually (fr-40, fr-60, fr-80) is exactly the same as (fr_FR-40, fr_FR-60, fr_FR-80). There is the same thing for de.multi and de_DE.multi. Cheers -- Melvin Hadasht _______________________________________________ Aspell-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel
