On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > I am merely quoting the closest thing to a copyright notice for all of the > wordlist as generally required by copyright law. RMS basically said the > word list meets FSF definition of Free (which should in term meet Debian > guidelines).
Meeting the FSF's definition of "free" does not always imply meeting Debian's definition of "free", although they usually coincide. > That should be all that you need to know. Even if it was true, it still wouldn't necessarily be sufficient to *convince* him (and d-legal) that it's correct. > If you want I > can add a note that all word lists used are FSF Free to the copyright > notice. If a license clarification is needed, I don't believe this will help. -- Glenn Maynard _______________________________________________ Aspell-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel
