Christoph Hintermüller wrote: > Afaik the ispell like affixes are allready on the todolist or might be
Yes, I saw this, and I think it is great. I just wanted to add my hopes that the definition goes beyond ispell. In my attempts to create a better Swedish aspell dictionary, I have switched to an annotated ispell format for my source, and generate the aspell format by filtering away the comments and piping the results through "ispell -e" (I think -e is for expand). According to the GPL section 3 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html), "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it", and this is the format that I prefer for editing my dictionary. >From my Makefile: .SUFFIXES: .txt .aspell .txt.aspell: sed 's/[ ]*#.*//' $<|ispell -e|tr ' ' '\n'|sort -u >$@ A dictionary for a new language, and its format, is a treasure that can be developed independent of the actual spell checking software. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) tel +46-70-7891609 http://aronsson.se/ http://elektrosmog.nu/ http://susning.nu/ _______________________________________________ Aspell-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel
