On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Gary Setter wrote:
> <snip>
> > > I only have VC6.0 and Borlands BCB5.5. So that is what I'm
> > > porting to.
> >
> > CygWin and MinGW use Gcc and available for free. Do a Google
> search.
> I didn't say I could not have them, I said that I did not have
> them. What I have suits me fine.
With a little effort Aspell should compile just fine under CygWin and
MinGW. These binaries can be used by other applications since I use a C
interface. There for I find this the best solution.
> > > I've tried to express why I believe the ported code is better
> > > code. Why do you believe that it is not?
> >
> > Because the changes to get Aspell to compile with VC are
> generally ugly.
>
> Sometimes, sometimes not.
> Take this line from convert.hpp
> class Convert {
> private:
> static const size_t memory_size = 96;
> };
> I believe it is none standard to initialize member data in a
> class definition.
You are wrong. It is allowed if it is an int type.
> The alternative is using an enum. Not ugly at all.
>
> enum {memory_size = 96};
In my view yes.
By ugly I main VC++ specific hacks like the one above.
> What is the alternative? What is happening now is the same things
> have to be changed to port the code with each release. That seems
> kind of ugly to me.
You are welcome to submit patches. I may even approve them into the main
source if they are not too ugly.
I personally do not think it is worth the effort.
--
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org
_______________________________________________
Aspell-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel
