Hi Kevin and all. It's been a while since I looked at Aspell in detail.
I had a Debian bug report on Text::Aspell http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203517 Where they created a spelling object and then tried to change the language. Is my understanding correct that once the speller is created that changing "lang" in this example should have no effect? In other words doesn't creating the speller bind the options to a dictionary file? If that's true, is it true for all options? And if for all options should setting an option on an existing Speller report an error? After I create a speller object I get the config settings back via: self->config = aspell_speller_config(self->speller); If you do look at that bug report you should know that Text::Aspell will create the speller automatically the first time check() or suggest() are called. The xs interface code is at: http://search.cpan.org/src/HANK/Text-Aspell-0.02/Aspell.xs I have fixed two segfaults in the soon-to-CPAN 0.03 version. BTW -- a few people have asked for a way to pass entire documents to Aspell through Text::Aspell. Something like piping a document to aspell -a. I don't suppose there's an API for that -- or even an API to use to split works so I could check them one at a time. Another BTW -- the docs at http://savannah.gnu.org/download/aspell/manual/user/6_Writing.html show AspellManager * spell_checker = 0; but in my code I see I have: AspellSpeller * spell_checker = 0; Is that just an issue of the on-line docs? Thanks, -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Aspell-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-user
