Art Smoot wrote: > > No. The correct thing to do is first check if "co-counsel" is in the > > dictionary, than if not check both parts. Aspell does not support this > > behavior yet. > > I would agree with that assessment, but still the basic question is how do > you > get "co-counsel" into the dictionary?
Today, Aspell first defines which characters can go into the words of a language, and then only these characters can be used in the dictionary. It ought to be the other way around: If the dictionary contains "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" than that should be a valid word, not because it contains valid letters but because it is in the dictionary. There should be no need for a classification of letters, as this could be derived from the dictionary. This would not only allow "co-counsel" but also "Absolut Vodka" to be a "word" in the dictionary, even if "Absolut" on its own is not. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se _______________________________________________ Aspell-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-user
