|
I think if ULFA would come up with
a solid plan how to spend that 5 billion dollar for Assam and agree to put that
money in a common World Bank account to be spent only for the cause of Assam, I
would support the ULFA move and would demand the money from GOI instead and
not from ONGC. But I will not support ULFA if they want to collect the money and
spend in Bangladesh Movie industry or any other personal investment depriving
the people of Assam and making the people of Assam even poorer.
Parallel govts must have its own
accountability.
Assamese people are saying NO to
Hobo Diok.
They are saying : Amar Upai
Nai.
RB
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:25
PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is
ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Heh! heh! Barua, that is yet another explanation for the faux pas.
The idea seems to put the onus on the GOI. But who knows?
On 1/18/06, Barua25
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"Be that as it may, the demand note to the ONGC
will not hamper the peace process since extortion
by militants is not unusual."
Thinking again, I think the
above statement by MRG may be a 'wish' statement. Note the adverb
'will not'. Normally only a spekeperson from GOI wiould use
the phrase 'will not'. MRG should have used 'should not', but by
using the 'word 'will not', she is in fact wishing to tell the GOI, " Of
course, you are not going to stop the negotiations simply because of this
demand note, are you? You know these milliants do this kind of thing al the
time. You better hurry to do the negotiations so that they will not do
such things." In fact she is wishing that the demand note issue may be used
as a some kind of trump card and force GOI to do some realpolitics.
Otherwise, I could not see why she used 'will not' without any
authority and did not use 'should not'.
RB
|
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
