|
No No No,
Don't tabulate
anything.
They donot need even that one
which too weak and too late anyway!!!!
RB
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:52
PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Well-oiled Assam
sits pretty - Telegraph
<<<'ULFA does not need any
justification for independence'>>>
Britsh left.
The East India Company tricked inand stayed put.Brits left-so it's ours
back again.
That's it
mm
From: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
"mc mahant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Chan
Mahanta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
<[email protected]>
Subject:
Re: [Assam] Well-oiled Assam sits pretty - Telegraph
Date: Wed,
25 Jan 2006 17:25:58 -0600
Why it is so
difficult?
Let us take one statement at a
time:
ONE
'ULFA does not need any
justification for independence'
Does the above
statement make sense? The meaning is ULFA is not trying (or does not
want) to justify or debate why they need independence.
RB
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:14
PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Well-oiled Assam
sits pretty - Telegraph
Its phoolosophical stuff, not meant for comprehension by
ordinary humans.
At 8:13 AM +0530 1/24/06, mc mahant wrote:
<<<
One (ULFA)
does not need any justification for independence.
The other
(ULFA supporters) try to justify while there may not be any
justification.
Once this
is clear, you will understand better why some news are no news to
some.
Does it
make sense?....>>>
None!
mm
|
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
