Dear Mukul,
 
I thank you very cordially for the information.
 
I was imagining an underwater Kaplan turbine for illuminating the statue of Swargadeo Chakradhwaja Sinha and for illuminating the geometry of the ATAN BURAGOHAIN SAKO. I am glad that someone thought about the same thing --- but it must not be turned into a huge electric generator station that will ruin the view.
 
An electric generator station, unless designed properly, will completely ruin the view and the environment ---  something pointed out by Chandan. However, if designed properly, an underwater Kaplan Turbine (which sounds similar to the "Run-of -the -river Axial Bulb Type Hydro Turbine" that you mentioned) can be kept out of sight which will not ruin the view. 
 
Thanks for the information. This is a positive approach. It appears Chandan has more information based on what he said to me "You are unaware of the geography, the lay of the river and what impact it may have on navigation,or at its foot for access ramps etc. But you can educate yourself if you download the Google Earth free-software and go look up Guwahati from the air, quite easily."
 
As for downloading "Google Earth free-software and go look up Guwahati from the air", I leave it to the younger generation. They should find out all these information and enlighten the public.   I urge the artists and architects and bridge engineers of Assam to imagine a graceful bridge with “poetry in its geometry” as a permanent and constant reminder of what we achieved in the past. "Atan Buragohain Sako” is not for crossing a river. It will take us across three centuries of Time to fill our heart with hope, glory, self-confidence, self-sacrifice and a strong determination.
 
Please share any other information you have about the geography, the lay of the river and what impact it may have on navigation,or at its foot for access ramps etc. I have requested Indrajit to get a survey of the site.You must be in the Selection Committee to select the final design made by younger generation. I hope to see the Brigde from the other bank of Baitarani.
 
I request you to give up the anti-India anger. Uncontrolled Anger is dangerous. It hurts everybody. Verse 21 Chapter 16 Bhagavadgita. 
 
With love to everybody,
Himendra
 
----- Original Message -----
From: mc mahant
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] RATNAKANA BARKAKOTI SAKO

<<<<… you and Chandan Mahanta should be members in the Selection Committee.>>> -ABX(!!!)

ABX site proposed by Himen is already reserved forthe first(in Oxom) Run-of -the -river Axial Bulb Type Hydro Turbine Electric generating station.
mm



From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Himendra Thakur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "mc mahant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: J Kalita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, MANOJ KUMAR DAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Assam] RATNAKANA BARKAKOTI SAKO
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:51:58 -0600

Hello Himen-da:

I know it was not meant for me, even though I do feature in it and I don't mean to speak for my brother either. But I thought a response is called for.


>I have come to know that people of Nagaon has recently named a bridge over the Kolong River after their beloved >poet and named it “RATNAKANA BARKAKOTI SAKO

*** No harm done. Names are not as problematic as building a pedestrian bridge to Umananda, but for what?

Did Santiago Caltrava's bridge over the Sacramento river at Redding, California (http://www.viamagazine.com/top_stories/articles/Redding04.asp ) inspire you to propose the Atan B Xako ( ABX). If it did, you can 'fess up to it. It would demonstrate good taste.

But it would be a bad case of 'me-too-ism'.

I gave you my reasons. If they seemed without substance, you would have surely responded. And if not you, at least  all my other net-opponent friends would have gotten on my case as could be seen daily. You had no care about costs/ benefits ( unexpected, considering your decades of engineering at Boston), appropriateness of building a monument where scores of homeless families don't have the dignity of living like humans. You are unaware of the geography, the lay of the river and what impact it may have on navigation,or at its foot for access ramps etc. But you can educate yourself if you download the Google Earth free-software and go look up Guwahati from the air, quite easily.

But all that on the practicality point, provided a conceptual justification could be made. That is where the abject failure of the idea lies.

Your idea is rooted in the same kind of silly notion like the monument of Lasit at the military academy in Chennai, as if Assam's discontent is rooted on its not being noticed by India.

Suspicion? Heck no Himen-da. It is a well-known fact that the efforts at Hinduization of Assam as a means for perpetuating Indian occupation is what that other light( weight) general and the current one at the guvnor's mansion are dedicated to, with a little help from Assam's own of course.


>Chandan Mahanta came up with “Statute of Limitation” in the USA about which he accused that I did not know.

*** I don't know you much Himen da. But from what I did know from our couple of encounters, I thought you are just as clever and informed a person as the rest of us. And on that basis, your claim of being clueless about my referring to the 'statute of limitations' is not persuasive. First it was NOT about the ABX, it was about your thinly disguised, fascist, Muslim-baiting, holding them to be invaders and tyrants six hundred plus years after the fact and casting aspersions on if not questioning directly their rights to citizenship in the land where they have lived for millenia, just because a few centuries back they changed their religious affiliation either under coercion or under free will.

And coming from someone like yourself, who probably claimed US citizenship with a mere five or so years in the country, enjoying the benefits and protections of a secular society with a rule of law,it is that much more unbecoming, hypocritical.


>About eighty years ago, my uncle, the late Indreswar Barthakur, drew paintings of Sati Jaimati and Lachit. Those >paintings were very inspiring.

>I do agree that the statue of Lachit at National Defence Academy and the portrait of Shankardeva in Kharghuli may >not bring forth the life-force of those departed souls. These art-works have been done by commercial artists who >may not have felt the spirit of the departed souls.




*** Good for you. I have not seen Barthakur's paintings, and thus will refrain from attempting to judge them on their artistic merit. But on the intellectual aspect of requiring an icon ( or  idol ) of either to draw inspiration from is a baggage you too carry from orthodox-Hindu traditions, something Xonkordeu tried so hard to wean the people of Assam from, but obviously not very successfully.


>I never asked anyone to build an ugly bridge, or to build a sore-thumb for a statue.

*** One does not have to Himen-da. We can draw inferences from the examples of all that have been erected thus far.

>… you and Chandan Mahanta should be members in the Selection Committee. 

*** You are kind. But if I were to be anywhere near there, I would wear a placard on my neck and demonstrate against the idea as a ludicrous one.




>I appeal to the “artists and architects and bridge engineers of Assam” not to copy from anybody.


*** Personally, I believe a good copy of something creative in the realm of public structures is a whole lot better than a bad or insipid original.


Finally, on the protestations about your innocence on the Hinduttwabadi appearance and the proof you cite to back it up--that Hinduttwawallas attack you on your dowry abolition crusade, you forget that we do know about the many shades that Hinduttwa exponents come in: From the know-nothing,lumpen variety's crude and coercive methods to the  suave knowledge-brigades' slick attempts at revising history and manufacturing pseudo-intellectual arguments like you have been indulging in.

I don't enjoy having to resort to such strident language again here. Even though I am very un-traditional and irreverent a kharkhowa, I do treat my seniors with a degree of respect and deference. But you leave me with little choice with your very poorly disguised but audacious Muslim-baiting agenda, something you will find very few takers in Assam Net.

Regards,

Chandan




At 8:55 AM -0500 1/29/06, Himendra Thakur wrote:
Dear Mukul,
In response to Saurav’s question   “<<<how much does the statue of lachit at saraighat inspire people?>>>”    you have replied “Not at all ! And we should have no Busts, Statues, Xetus, Tombs, -all alien to our passing times.  Everybody does his best in his time--and Go.”
I have come to know that people of Nagaon has recently named a bridge over the Kolong River after their beloved poet and named it “RATNAKANA BARKAKOTI SAKO” --- a fitting tribute to a dear, adorable poet of Assamese language. In my life, I cannot forget a bus ride I had from Nagaon to Guwahati (it took 4 hours in those days) when I was suddenly lucky to find that I was sitting next to poet Ratnakanta Barkakoti --- that has remained a lifetime memory for me --- I was a young student at that time. I don’t want to write about that memory because Chandan may again accuse me for citing anecdotes which he suspects as an effort for drumbeating personal importance. I still think it is important (maybe even “better”) to talk from personal experience where we see the things directly instead of reading in a book. But, restrained by Chandan, I better refrain.
There are too much of suspicion, implication, blame, accusation, insinuation, etc. in assam-net. The worst is stereotyping, like “Christan Khasi” “Hindu Guvnor” “Scythian subgroup thukarian”, etc.
While I proposed ATAN BURAGOHAIN SAKO and a Statue of Swargadeo Chakradhwaja Sinha, Chandan Mahanta came up with “Statute of Limitation” in the USA about which he accused that I did not know. He vehemently opposed everything that I proposed by saying that the bridge would be ugly, the statue would stand up like a sore-thumb, people would dump garbage on (or, from) the bridge, etc., etc.
I never asked anyone to build an ugly bridge, or to build a sore-thumb for a statue. Mine was an appeal to the artists, architects and bridge-engineers … “I urge the artists and architects and bridge engineers of Assam to imagine a graceful bridge with “poetry in its geometry” …. ”
About eighty years ago, my uncle, the late Indreswar Barthakur, drew paintings of Sati Jaimati and Lachit. Those paintings were very inspiring. I think those are now lost. 
I do agree that the statue of Lachit at National Defence Academy and the portrait of Shankardeva in Kharghuli may not bring forth the life-force of those departed souls. These art-works have been done by commercial artists who may not have felt the spirit of the departed souls.
The problem can be solved by holding a competition of prototypes by the “artists and architects and bridge engineers of Assam”  and selecting the best art-work … you and Chandan Mahanta should be members in the Selection Committee. 

I appeal to the “artists and architects and bridge engineers of Assam” not to copy from anybody.


 
As for the practice of copying by young people, at a get-together at Shankardev Kalakshetra in Guwahati in 2004, I was asked if I had any advise for the your dramatists of Assam. My immediate response was: “Don’t copy anybody. Write right from your own heart, with your own observations. It may be difficult at the beginning. But, very soon the mind will open up.”
The prototype art-work submitted in the competition (but not selected as the final winner) maybe saved at a proposed riverside Museum where people will see the noble efforts of all the “artists and architects and bridge engineers of Assam” …  people will be inspired, like they were when they named “RATNAKANA BARKAKOTI SAKO” across our lovely Kolong River.
Santanu Roy has objected about “simple yearning for a mythical golden past or some attempt to turn back the clock of history and social "progress"  …. I did not propose ATAN BURGAHAIN SAKO “to turn back the clock of history and social progress" … it is very clearly stated as “a graceful bridge with “poetry in its geometry” as a permanent and constant reminder of what we achieved in the past. "Atan Buragohain Sako” is not for crossing a river. It will take us across three centuries of Time to fill our heart with hope, glory, self-confidence, self-sacrifice and a strong determination.”
As for your comment   “Kudos to Saurav-he is indeed Mr.-or Dr Logic , Dr analysis. I am proud for him”
I must say that I found a number of errors in his analyses and logic, which I’ll reply later. Right now, this letter is already too long.
With memories of good old days, and appealing to you to give up the anti-India attitude,
Himendra

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to