C-da,
Pl. give your logic then.
Umesh
I and Rajen-da wrote:
To: Rajen Barua ; Ram Sarangapani
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] IE: Anti-conversion law in Rajasthan?
Rajen-da,
Just like Right to live does not mean Right to kill --though everyone who is born must die sometime. Perhaps similalrly, just because religions spread by getting converted to a faith or belief -- does not mean that you get license to convert others.
Umesh
Rajen Barua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ram:In one recent email, we discussed this very issue, (That Hindus believe that one has to be born a Hindu and that they donot convert) and my answer was same as now:The Tai Ahoms in Assam, all the Hindus in South East Asia, to say the least, were all converted to Hindus. They were not BORN Hindus as you try to cliam.Even in India, all non Aryans were were picked up and converted to Hindus en mass at one time or another, and that is how Hinduism grew.So your assumption that Hindus donot convert was wrong.To this you replied that you would check on this point and would respond.I donot find the email now. I might have deleted. But that does not make any difference. If you donot remember, you may ignore my remarks now and just try to respond to the question now afresh.RB
-----
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just because one can mouth off, does not mean what is mouthed off has any merit in it.While I can go about blabbering anything I wish to exercising my freedom of _expression_, it is NOT without consequences.What could the consequences of expressing meaningless or outright dumb things?You take a guess!At 11:31 PM +0100 4/10/06, umesh sharma wrote:Thats your choice. One can calll anything one wants. There is freedom of _expression_:)Umesh
Rajen Barua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That I would call a twisted Hindu logic.RB
----- Original Message -----From: umesh sharmaTo: Rajen Barua ; Ram SarangapaniCc: [email protected]Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:10 PMSubject: Re: [Assam] IE: Anti-conversion law in Rajasthan?Rajen-da,Just like Right to live does not mean Right to kill --though everyone who is born must die sometime. Perhaps similalrly, just because religions spread by getting converted to a faith or belief -- does not mean that you get license to convert others.Umesh
Rajen Barua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ram:In one recent email, we discussed this very issue, (That Hindus believe that one has to be born a Hindu and that they donot convert) and my answer was same as now:The Tai Ahoms in Assam, all the Hindus in South East Asia, to say the least, were all converted to Hindus. They were not BORN Hindus as you try to cliam.Even in India, all non Aryans were were picked up and converted to Hindus en mass at one time or another, and that is how Hinduism grew.So your assumption that Hindus donot convert was wrong.To this you replied that you would check on this point and would respond.I donot find the email now. I might have deleted. But that does not make any difference. If you donot remember, you may ignore my remarks now and just try to respond to the question now afresh.RB
-----
Umesh Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park, MD 20740
1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]
Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005
Yahoo! Photos NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo.
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
