>Otherwise you would not have waited all this
>while to do so in a "I told you so" mode.


*** No, I spoke of it much earlier. That is why I 
took on Mayur Bora and Rajib Das in their expert 
recommendations in the past.

There is no better time to remind people than when it is playing out.

>  >It would be
>nice to note that if the economy is growing at 8%
>there would be enough fundamentals for many well
>managed companies.

*** Of course there are good companies. And the 
individual investor will now, having lost his 
shirt, and nest-egg, will rush to pick up the 
good buys at bargain-basement prices, as will the 
savvy FIIs staffed with desi-analysts -- those 
grads. of IITs and IIMs, endowed with Dilbertian 
'huge-brains', who know all about market-timing 
to make money, right?

And how will we know when that happens? Of course 
when the market jumps right back to its 
go-go-levels.

But *I* won't hold my breath.







>It would be nice to be aware - if at all one goes by
>the stock index as a barometer of the country's health
>- that the Sensex went up 3000 points in the last 1
>year before it went down 1000 points. Perhaps one
>should also be aware that the reasons for the FIIs to
>panic is a rumour about what tax rules apply - Capital
>Gains or Business Income. Any time tax rules change in
>any country, the fundamentals for many companies
>change too. It is basic math.
>
>C-da talks grandiosely about fundamentals. It would be
>nice to note that if the economy is growing at 8%
>there would be enough fundamentals for many well
>managed companies. Talking of fundamentals, have you
>done any research on what many of the companies are
>earning as returns? Offcourse there would be a lot of
>people making wrong decisions about betting on the
>wrong horses in both good times and bad. That is why
>stock markets run the way they do.
>
>The average Indian (as also an average American) who
>does not know investing should not be a retail
>investor - if at all he should be investing in mutual
>funds. Some of the best funds yielded returns of more
>than 100% last year and an average of more than 50% in
>the last 3 years.
>
>C'da, it is a wrong horse in the Indian stable to whip
>about. Otherwise you would not have waited all this
>while to do so in a "I told you so" mode. You and the
>Indian communist party members are the only one doing
>so.
>
>
>
>
>
>--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>  The big differences are:
>>
>>  1:  In the fundamentals of the companies being
>>  invested in.
>>
>>  2: Institutional checks and balances ( read:
>>  Umesh's mention of Harshad Mehtas et al, the FM's
>>  loose comments on taxing FIIs)
>>
>>  If the 1 above had a solid foundation 2 could not
>>  cause the kind of havoc it has.
>>
>>  India has not seen the big fall and the Great
>>  Depression. But this one ought to teach Indians a
>>  lesson, a lesson much grimmer, I am sure, than
>>  what developed economies have been experiencing
>>  or experienced in recent decades, considering the
>>  average Indian's circumstances.
>>
>>  Indian stock market movers fancy themselves the
>>  new Wall Street considering all the desi
>>  analysts, desi Bus. Mgm't whipper-snappers at
>>  Wall Street. But the average Indian does not know
>>  the difference. In fact some otherwise savvy
>>  Indians constituting he new
>>  desi-knowledge-brigade don't either, as we have
>>  seen right here in this forum.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  At 12:18 AM -0500 5/23/06, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>>  >C'da,
>>  >  >Speculative forces, such as FIIs that drove up
>>  >Sensex, creating an illusion that the
>>  >desi->economy is on a roll, is ephemeral.
>>  >
>>  >Isn't that the nature of financial markets - ie.
>>  >of expectations? Why single out Desis for the
>>  >way sensex is behaving. All the world's major
>>  >markets are taking a beating this past week.
>>  >
>>  >Heck, even for a small time investor like me, I
>>  >was counting on the millions 10 days ago (when
>>  >the DOW was at heady heights), and then the
>>  >millions vanished. Will be lucky if I get away
>  > >with my principal.
>>  >
>>  >As for our Umesh's idea of a Buffet style
>>  >investing (long, big cap), most investers in the
>>  >US markets (like elsewhere) are short, small or
>>  >medium cap. Long, big caps require huge
>>  >investments, and that will have to wait till I
>>  >make them millions.
>>  >
>>  >  >creating an illusion that the desi-economy is on
>>  a roll
>>  >
>>  >Following that logic, the US economy is doing
>>  >pretty well (actually on a roll) - why then is
>>  >the DOW not reflecting that? Why the
>>  >roller-coaster effects of the past couple of
>>  >weeks?
>>  >
>>  >In the C'da - the markets only reflect
>>  >only investor expectations. You could call
>>  >it "irrational exhuberance" :-)
>>  >
>>  >--Ram
>>  >
>>  >On 5/22/06, Chan Mahanta
>>  ><<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>  >wrote:
>>  >
>>  >I don't know if he does. Have not spoken to him
>>  >since 1968, even though he was a fine younger
>>  >friend.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >But I do have one: Gambling is NOT for everyone.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >Speculative forces, such as FIIs that drove up
>>  >Sensex, creating an illusion that the
>>  >desi-economy is on a roll, is ephemeral. I
>>  >remember our good friend Mayur lamenting about
>>  >Kharkhowas' ignorance about making easy money on
>>  >'derivatives'. And I remember vaguely about a
>>  >Sentinel editorial of recent weeks lamenting
>>  >about the Oxomiya populace unaware of 'right
>>  >wing ideology' or some such thing--whatever that
>>  >meant, but it would seem now the ignorant ones
>>  >must be having the last laugh.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >At 2:38 AM +0100 5/23/06, umesh sharma wrote:
>>  >
>>  >>C-da,
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >You have rich friends! Does he have any tips for us
>>  Desis.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >Umesh
>>  >
>>  >Chan Mahanta
>>  <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >You have got to stop comparing the US scene and
>>  >its players with the Indian scene and its
>>  >players, Umesh. They have little in common,
>>  >other than on the wrapper.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >BTW, Warren Buffets right hand man, one of his
>>  >closest confidants, is a desi, a junior wingmate
>>  >of ours from IIT-KGP.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >At 2:07 AM +0100 5/23/06, umesh sharma wrote:
>>  >
>>  >>In the land of Big Bull Harshad Mehta and Con
>>  >>Artist Ketan Parikh it is only fools who invest
>>  >>in Indian stock market. People should learn
>>  >>from Warren Buffet (world's top finance
>>  >>investor and second richest man ) who only
>>  >>invests LONG Term in stocks -which he gets
>>  >>great deal of info and analysis.
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >Umesh
>>  >
>>  >Chan Mahanta
>>  <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  >I hope none of our desi-investment promoting
>>  >friends is being hurt by this. And if they are,
>>  >hope not too badly.
>>  >
>>  >Is the end of the nightmare in sight yet?
>>  >
>>  >cm
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >On a day of crazy swings, Sensex sinks below 10K
>>  >[ Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:34:10 amTIMES NEWS
>>  NETWORK ]
>>  >
>>  >RSS Feeds| SMS NEWS to 8888 for latest updates
>>  >
>>  >MUMBAI: It was a raging storm. The market turned
>>  >crazily wild, lashing the Sensex with such
>>  >ferocity that at one point it plumbed down over
>>  >1100 points. Trading had to be suspended. Or else
>>  >the ship might have sunk. When trading resumed,
>>  >the storm hadn⤁t cleared, but the market clung
>>  >to the lifeline of assurances thrown by the
>>  >finance minister, RBI and SEBI. It clawed back
>>  >some 700 points, but still closed 450 points down.
>>  >
>>  >Veterans tried, and failed to recall this kind
>>  >of volatility. In just seven sessions the market
>>  >has sucked out over Rs 6 lakh crore of
>>  >investors⤁ wealth. And there are chances of
>>  >further losses. Some brave souls claimed the
>>  >worst was over, but the considered advice of
>>  >seasoned players was: "Don⤁t try to catch a
>>  >falling knife â¤" don⤁t try to predict the
>>  >bottom of the market. Not yet."
>>  >
>>
>=== message truncated ===>
>_______________________________________________
>>  assam mailing list
>>  [email protected]
>>
>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to