|
>And if there is a God, would he be bothered by the
action of the earthly people?
You must be kidding!!
The very theory of God postulate
that He is influenced by the action of man, He watch the actions of man and
reward the good and punish the bad. In other words, He controls the destiny
of man. The theory is that if man can please Him, He will reward man with luck,
wealth, power, health and happiness. That is logic why people worship Gods like
Ganesha, Lakshmi, Saraswati, Durga, Vishnu, Shiva etc. According to
the incarnation theory, Krishna and Rama etc incarnated because they care about
earthly people, and they incarnated to bring peace and happiness to the earthly
people.
Conversely, if God does not care
about earthly people, why people need to care about and worship
God?
If there is God, which I sincerely
doubt, I believe He is not a compassionate and benevolent God. Otherwise
why there is so much sufferings of the earthly people.
RB
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india
-myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses etc
Does having more critics make a religion more favorable to God, if
there is a God? And if there is a God, would he be bothered by the action of
the earthly people?
How is God being partial? Can affluence be eternal peace or a step
closer to God?
From: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [email protected]
Subject:
Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india -myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses
etc
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:55:54 -0500
Umesh:
Frankly speaking, I doubt if God will help you.
If Rama and Krishna were genuine incarnations of God, they
would have, by this time, established themselves firmly their
positions against Western Christian critics. That they have not done that,
shows that either there is no God or they were fake incarnations, and guys
like you are trying their best to believe something which is not
true.
What do you say? Do you think God is partial to
Christianity?
RB
From: umesh sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rajen & Ajanta Barua
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, xourov pathok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ram
Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india
-myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses etc
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006
16:12:16 +0100 (BST)
well I agree to that.
I need God's help again.
after eating Chinese dish -which did not mention what was in it (i
avoided seafood -since my last attack in Jan-for same reasons perhaps
-though my students had eye flu too) I look Chinese too - eyes are mere
slits. The rashes have gone but breathing is still heavy .
Umesh
Rajen & Ajanta Barua
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This
means the Hindus will haqve to do some homework to establish
historicity of Rama and Krsuhna. This does not mean they are all
myth, but
they have to prove otherwise.
Compare these to
Jesus.
RB
----- Original Message -----
From: "xourov
pathok"
To: ; "Ram Sarangapani"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, June 18,
2006 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india -myth of
Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses
etc
>
>
> --- umesh
sharma wrote:
>
>> Any comments about Mythical nature of
Jesus, Moses
>> or Muhammad?
>> There is NO historical
proof that any of the above
>> did any miraculous work to
render them divine --like
>> resurrection of Christ, parting
the waves crossing
>> the Red sea by Moses etc --yet despite
the stories
>> circulating around them which defy human logic
-they
>> are believed to have existed.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
>
>
>>
Why not about Ram or Krishna ( recently they have
>> even found
an underwater city -adjacent Dwarka-
>> established by Krishna
-as mentioned in Mahabharat
>> and other Hindu texts) -despite
some
>> miraculous/illogical events?
>
> rama and
krishna are given as much historicity as
> possible, according to
the evidence. the underwater
> city they claim as dwarka is not
confirmed. the
> problem is let alone dwarka, even
hastinapur,
> indraprastha etc have not been properly
identified.
> even though they have found settlements, they do
not
> correspond to cities, let alone grand cities as
>
depicted in the epics. this does not negate the
> possibility of a
historical indraprastha, of course.
> it simply means we have not
found it yet.
>
>
>
>
Umesh
Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park, MD
20740
1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]
Ed.M. - International
Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard
University,
Class of 2005
weblog: http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
Now you can have your favourite RSS headlines come to you with the all
new Yahoo! Mail.
>_______________________________________________
>assam mailing
list
>[email protected]
>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
|
