>If somebody sings Vande Mataram voluntarily,
I have no objections. But if people are forced >to do so, it will
meet with resistance, Bukhari said.
*** I have seen this issue in and out of the news several times
in the past.
The above seems reasonable to me. How about you?
At 8:05 AM -0700 8/21/06, Dilip/Dil Deka wrote:
The following news item is thought-provoking. Religion vs. state again?
=====================================================
Guwahati, Monday, August 21, 2006
Vande Mataram against Islamic beliefs: Bukhari
ALLAHABAD, Aug 20 The national song Vande Mataram is against Islamic beliefs and asking Muslims to sing it would amount to suppression of the community, Shahi Imam of Delhis Jama Masjid Syed Ahmed Bukhari said today. Addressing a press meet here, Bukhari, who is also patron of the United Democratic Front (UDF), said according to the tenets of Islam, one could love ones country and even lay down ones life for it if the circumstances so demand.
But when it comes to worship only Allah is given that honour. A Muslim cannot worship his or her parents, motherland and even the Prophet though they are held in high esteem, he said, reacting to a Central directive to states for recitation of Vande Mataram in educational institutions during a celebration on September seven to mark the national songs centenary.
Ever since independence, all governments at the Centre and in the states have been suppressing Muslims. This proposal is yet another example. If somebody sings Vande Mataram voluntarily, I have no objections. But if people are forced to do so, it will meet with resistance, Bukhari said. PTI
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
