Very fine,well researched informative article by 
Saleh Saheb at 
http://nenews.info/index.php?id=844. One of the 
best!

cm



By Wahid Saleh

In February, the Assam Cabinet adopted a 
resolution to change the official name of the 
state from Assam to Asom. The reason given is 
that the name Assam is not an indigenous one and 
was coined by the British. Are there any 
historical documents to prove that the name Assam 
was given by the British?

The Dutch are famous for keeping records. A quick 
search of the word Assam in the Dutch archives 
gave the following results:

A map of the Kingdom of Bengale was published 
around 1662. The map was drawn by a Dutchman, Joh 
van Leenen, who was in "Bengale" in 1661. This 
map was ordered by Mattheus van den Broucke 
(1620-1685) and was inserted in the collection of 
François Valentijn's Oud en nieuw Oost-Indien 
(Dordrecht, 1724). The name Assam appears on the 
map.

A letter sent by Joan Maertsuyker, 
Governor-General of the Dutch Batavia, 
congratulated Mirjumala on 29 August, 1663 
addressing him as "Š.Grooten Mogol in Assam".
Another Dutch publication Vervarelyke Schip-breuk 
van 't Oost-Indisch jacht Ter Schelling, based on 
a diary kept by a Dutchman who in 1662 was forced 
to fight with the army of Mirjumla published in 
1675, mentions the names Assam and Assamer, as 
the names of the region and its inhabitants, 
respectively.

The story of Travelling with Clara mentions that 
a rhino calf was captured in 1738 in Assam in the 
kingdom of the Great Mogol. The rhino named Clara 
arrived in Rotterdam on 22-07-1741 and was 
exhibited all over Europe. Even today, different 
paintings and statues of Clara can be found in 
different museums of the world.

Moreover, before the British arrived in Assam 
different Mughal historians used the names Assam, 
Asham, Ascham, Acham and Ásám in their writings." 
Asom" with an "o" in between was unknown to them. 
In particular, the word Assam is mentioned in the 
following publications: Abul Fazal Allámi in his 
compilation of Akbarnama, a biographical account 
of Akbar (1542 -1605) mentioned "Rajah of Asham"

Abd al-Hamid Lahuri is known solely for his 
official history of the reign of Mughal Emperor 
Sahjahan, entitled Padshah-namah(1627-1647). He 
wrote about the rebellion in Kúch-Hájú, which 
lies on the banks of the Brahmaputra, a large 
river, two kos in width, which flows from the 
country of Áshám into Bengal.

Alamgir-Namah, The Book of Aurangzeb by Muhammad 
Kazim ibn Muhammad Amin (1657-1667), Aurangzeb's 
secretary mentions Asham. Assam is also mentioned 
in Shahábuddin Tálásh's work, Tarikh-i Mulk-i 
Áshám . This is an account of the expedition to 
Assam undertaken in the fourth year of the reign 
of Aurangzeb Adab-i`Alamgiri, written by Sayhkh 
Abu al-Fath Qabil Han (1662), compiled by Sayh 
Muhammad Sadiq of Ambala (1703 ) which is a 
collection of letters, state papers and documents 
written in the name of Aurangzeb, also mentions 
Assam.

"Assam" is mentioned in the book 
Baharistan-i-Ghaibi written by Alauddin Isfahan 
alias Mirza Nathan, a history of the Mughal wars 
in Assam, Cooch Behar, Bengal, Bihar and Orissa 
during the reigns of Jahangir and Shah Jahan, 
translated from the original Persian by MI Borah, 
Gauhati, 1936.

Jean Baptiste Tavernier (1605 - 89), a French 
jeweller and traveller in his work Travels in 
India, published in 1676 uses the spelling 
"Assen" for Assam in the French original.

Impero Del Gran Mogol (India) by Giovanni 
Albrizzi published in Venice in 1740 mentions 
"Acham" in this map of India from Atlante 
Novissimo Che Contiene Tutte Le Parti Del Mondo 
... This atlas was published in Venice and based 
mainly on the work of Isaak Tirion.

Acham is mentioned in French cartographer 
Rigobert Bonne's Carte de la Partie Superieure de 
l' Inde en deça du Gange, published around 1770.
The British arrived in Assam well after the 
Mughals went into decline and the reign of the 
Ahoms also had been weakened. The Treaty of 
Yandaboo was signed in 1826, under which Burma 
ceded all claims to Assam and other parts of what 
is the North-east today, and Assam came under 
British administration.

The British changed the original names of places 
in India only when they had a problem pronouncing 
the indigenous names properly. Assam was not that 
kind of word.From the above, it can be concluded 
that the British did not coin the name Assam; it 
existed well before the British! India has not 
changed its name from India to Bharat, at least 
in English. If India can live with the name of 
India, why can't the Assamese live with the name 
Assam? Do they have any valid reason to change 
the name from Assam to Asom?

Moreover, Assam is a "brand name". Assam is known 
all over the world for its finest tea besides 
having 820 species of birds (highest for any 
Indian state). Assam is an established name 
amongst the ornithologists. Changing the name of 
Assam may only marginalise whatever little name 
recognition the Assamese have in the world today.

According to Raijor Batori published by the Assam 
government, the change of name from Assam to Asom 
is still in a resolution form and is not yet 
official. It still has to get the Central 
government's approval. Respected and prestigious 
English language newspapers like The Assam 
Tribune, instead of conducting a debate to decide 
if the right spelling of the word Asom or Assam 
have simply started using the name Asom. It seems 
by this blind adoption, the print media is trying 
to make it a fait accompli.

India prides itself as a democratic country and 
plays a role model. In a democracy, there is no 
room for a hasty decision on an important 
non-crisis issue such as this without any public 
debate and to pass a hasty resolution for the use 
of the spelling Asom, for political purposes.

It would be appreciated by all concerned if the 
Assam government states openly the arguments in 
support of their proposal to change the name of 
the state. It seems in Assam at least on this 
issue those who speak don't know, and those who 
know, don't speak.

For an important issue like changing the 
historical identity of a region and its people, 
sufficient time and scope should be given for 
discussion and debate. Based on the historical 
evidence produced above, the author feels that 
this evidence should be brought to the notice of 
all concerned and the proposal to change the name 
of Assam to Asom should be withdrawn.

(The writer, an Assamese from Jorhat, lives in the Netherlands.)

Courtesy : The statesman

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to