Thanks for making my job a lot easier, Bhuban Kokaideu. Your answers are concise ,clear, easily understandable.

Nayan asks good questions, but he is getting ahead of himself, like Dilip Deka did yesterday. The questions also demonstrate a profound inadequacy of the understanding of makings of a democratic state, how it is supposed to function, and the citizens' responsibilities towards making it work. I would have hoped, people like Nayan, an advocate of the high-court, would have been more educated about it. But unfortunately it is yet another result of the colonial style of governance, controlled from a remote location, that failed to create the institutions at the grassroots level empowering them to learn how to govern themselves, while our educational system bypassed it entirely, creating generations of otherwise highly skilled people, whose idea of a democratic state begins and ends with the vaunted desi 'elekshuns'. Had India attempted to establish local institutions of democratic self-governance, instead of adopting the colonial rulers' top-down,remote controlled approach; sixty plus years since independence, India would have become a far better state today and would not be fighting insurgencies and rebellions all across the length and breadth of its territories, born out of the unresponsiveness and failure to deliver on its responsibilities.

Best regards,

c









At 8:29 AM -0500 2/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Language: en

As a student of political science and law, I feel I ought to attempt to respond to Nayan's questions.



'its high time that this issue gets settled as to why Assam needs to be independent

and what exactly will be happening in independent Assam after gaining independence.'



The first part of the question is very relevant. The Assamese people genuinely feel that they are not equal citizens with the rest of the country. They consider themselves to be second-class citizens being ruled by the Union Government in Delhi without due consideration for the all-round progress and development of the State or region.



1. Obviously it would be a democracy. Democracy has various forms. It would be determined by a Constituent Assembly as it happened after India became free.



2.      The people of Assam (if that name is retained).



3. The very essence of democracy is that the people have a say in that form of government. That right is inherent in a sovereign State.



4. The Constitution may lay down the qualifications required to hold public offices.
5.      In a democracy, some sort of election there must be.



6.      It is a routine matter of  the government to deal with.



7. In this exercise, we've not discussed how we are going to acquire independence. Boundaries, Sixth Schedule and many other subjects are dependent on this vital aspect.


8. An independent nation after becoming a member of the United Nations necessarily subscribes to the ideals of global peace under the UN.Charter. I think the questioner actually means law and order, maintenance of which is a basic function of every government.



Bhuban

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to