>What do you say when I compare ULFA's Jan 2007 killings of 67 innocent , unarmed Biharis with that of Osama Bin Laden's killings of Sep 11, 2001. If I remember correctly ULFA had killed 150 unramed Biharis in 2003 (in one go?) also and about 60 in 2000.

*** That you are pathetically ignorant and inferentially challenged.

*** That your outrage is selective, probably due to your ignorance, as well as being influenced by your agenda.







At 5:56 AM +0000 2/26/07, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da,

Assuming that you wrote the follwoing in support of ULFA ( I do not want to make another mistake due to damned English language)

***I shall not attempt to
        second-guess those fellow men of mine who had the courage and
        dedication to take up arms against an overwhelmingly larger and
        powerful adversary , knowing full well it could mean certain death
        and have pursued it tenaciously for a quarter century.

I shall not be the one to insult these brave men and women's sacrifices
        and courage, while never lifting  a finger or voicing a word
        in their support or quest. That is not MY style.

What do you say when I compare ULFA's Jan 2007 killings of 67 innocent , unarmed Biharis with that of Osama Bin Laden's killings of Sep 11, 2001. If I remember correctly ULFA had killed 150 unramed Biharis in 2003 (in one go?) also and about 60 in 2000.

Regards and bEST OF LUCK.

Umesh

Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I had no intention of getting into this originally, since my experience with the matter is on the light side :-). Not only because I had not served in any such movement, but also because I am not much of a history-of-conflicts buff. Rajen's question , a lawyer like Nayanjyoti would surely know, is called a 'leading question' in 'legalese'. They are usually not allowed in enlightened legal procedures, because they are designed to coach and elicit a particular answer, obviously to serve the interest of the questioner. But since it is not a court of justice, and since I do that all the time myself, the least I could do is to address it as best as I can.Furthermore, since I see occasional recommendations , usually to ULFA, here in Assam Net and in the Assam newspapers,from people who no doubt mean well, I thought it may not be a bad idea to examine the options and go where they may lead.

        *** >From the little I know of independence movements from the
        last two or three centuries, it is obvious that it always required
        violent confrontations, spilling of much blood, usually of the
        independence seekers.

        *** It is said that India's struggle for independence was a
        non-violent one. Unless I am terribly mistaken about the meaning
of the word non-violent, this statement must be the most daring con-jobs
        of deceptive marketing at best and the most bald faced of
        historical lies at worst.

        I know, I am taking a highly unpopular position here, probably
        at par with my last such position about Lasit's Whack several
        years back, if not even more outrage evoking.

        But like Rajen reminded me, I do have the arguments ready to defend my
        view, should anyone be interested in pursuing it :-).

        *** Rajen obviously hoped to lead me to take a stand here against those
        who took up arms in pursuit of this goal for Assam, citing the
        example of Mahatma Gandhi's tactics. But regardless of my penchant
        for violence, or respect for non-violence, I shall not attempt to
        second-guess those fellow men of mine who had the courage and
        dedication to take up arms against an overwhelmingly larger and
        powerful adversary , knowing full well it could mean certain death
        and have pursued it tenaciously for a quarter century.

        I shall not be the one to insult these brave men and women's sacrifices
        and courage, while never lifting  a finger or voicing a word
        in their support or quest. That is not MY style.

        *** Having said that, I will again acknowledge, like I always have,
        that without the support of a broad section of society's
        intelligentsia, and without a well formed political base, no
        independence movement against as overwhelming an adversary as India
        is to Assam, is ever likely to succeed. To that end, I agree with Rajen
        and others who advocate a discourse in Assam society. It was expected
        from ULFA, since they are the ones who held up the torch and led
        the struggle. ULFA has its reasons not to speak out publicly over
        the matter, and I understand them.

        But I submit, WE, Assam's well wishers and an elite segment of
        Assam's intelligentsia, has as much a responsibility to take
        it up,if not even more.


With that I conclude my say.

I would like to sit back now and take the brick-bats, or the kind of highly unexpected accolades that came from Nayan.

I hope I did not use the rope my friends here offered me to hang myself and appreciate their patience in letting me say my piece without interruptions and pot-shots. But regardless, I hope my time and effort here would serve as a spring-board to discuss and debate the subject, examine it for its worthiness for Assam's future.

And to all those who challenged me to embark on it, my only request: Please make your statements FOR or AGAINST independence, give your reasons, and take a stand. What will be most disappointing will be a disappearing act or a long bout of laryngitis.

I believe it was H.L. Mencken, the acerbic journalist and commentator who once said something to the effect that " I don't know of anyone going broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people". I hope no one will be tempted to echo Mencken with something like " I don't know of anyone going broke underestimating the courage or activism of the Assamnetters." :-).

Best regards.

cm



_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org




Umesh Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park,
(Washington D.C. Metro Region)
MD 20740

1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

weblog: http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
website: www.gse.harvard.edu/iep



<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/photos/*http://uk.photos.yahoo.com/>Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/photos/*http://uk.photos.yahoo.com/>quality print service from just 7p a photo.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to