>A second rung of demands other than unacheivalble one which can be >used for >benefit of the people.
*** That is very curious. Are we suggesting that the 'first-rung' is DESIRABLE, but unattainable, because WE DON"T WANT it and WON"T support efforts to attain them? That is about as circular a reasoning as one can imagine. *** And if what is DESIRABLE, but we won't support it, then WHAT are those 'second tier' , 'pragmatic' possibilities that ought to be tried? Can we hear about them? And how do we know, that there won't be yet another set of alibis to oppose those? One has to begin to establish some credibility somewhere. Or is that utopian too? >And that too now when the outfit still has got some bargaining position. *** Then where are those voices giving them that support to encourage that? >And I believe harping on "independence" is the easier way out-it is >not a >higher ambition. *** That must be high philosophy my kind cannot comprehend. >You dont have to do anything-the stalemate continues . *** And when they do, we will be there to demonize and discredit them, in the most infantile ways that people who care about having any credibility will never do. Isn't that what it is? Come on let us use our reasoning a bit more believably. At least hear of those 'second-tier' goals, shall we? Let us examine what resides in the fertile and imaginations of the 'pragmatic' ones. At 4:42 AM -0800 3/2/07, chittaranjan pathak wrote: >*****OK, assume the high aim is sovereignty. If you >fall short of that, what is the next lower aim? A >pragmatist looks at all possibilities. Have you? >What does ULFA have in mind when it sits at the >bargaining table with GOI? Stick to the sovereignty >mantra and leave the table when GOI wants to talk >about possibilities other than sovereignty? > >Dear Shri Dilip Deka > >You have raised a very good point. A second rung of >demands other than unacheivalble one which can be used >for benefit of the people.And that too now when the >outfit still has got some bargaining position. Once it > aquires a 100% nuiscense value, no body will BOTHER. >And I believe harping on "independence" is the easier >way out-it is not a higher ambition. >You dont have to do anything-the stalemate continues . >Regards > >Chittaranjan Pathak > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ >Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. >Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. >http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html > >_______________________________________________ >assam mailing list >assam@assamnet.org >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
