Only Nayan had the intestinal fortitude or the sincerity of purpose to >acknowledge it thus far.

*** I should have clarified this: Nayan only acknowledged that the outline I presented for a reformed Assam is desirable. Not its integral requirement , the TOOL to create it with, INDEPENDENCE that is.




At 11:28 AM -0600 3/2/07, Chan Mahanta wrote:
At 12:14 PM -0500 3/2/07, Barua, Rajen wrote:
Am I missing something?

You are missing 'how you achieve' independence of Assam big time.
Rajen




*** Are we not putting the cart before the horse?

WHY do we need independence? Are we in agreement that we do need it for the reasons I cited? If we do, why can't you say so? Only Nayan had the intestinal fortitude or the sincerity of purpose to acknowledge it thus far.

If we are in agreement then we can go to the next step: Look into possible ways of achieving it.

But if we don't agree on the very fundamental premise then it wioll be an absurd exercise, won't it?

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to