"This is a time for all revolutionary, democratic and nationality movements, like the ones in Kashmir and the Northeast to unite, and something will come out of this unity. We have very little expectations of the State and the comprador class that it represents."
Not really. What happened to all these tall statements in next door Nepal? Two days ago, 25 maoists were killed in clashes with the southern nepalese or Madheshis. Why? Because the Maoist ploy of flirting with local or ethnic sentiments which they claim to represent ends the moment they get into power. Ethnic priorities were never in sync with class war and Maoism. Varavara Rao the "poet" needs to clarify if any of Maoism's heroes - Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot were ever made to answer for the millions they mass-murdered under their brutal, autocratic and dictatorial regimes. ----- Original Message ---- From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:49:46 AM Subject: [Assam] From Tehelka 'If the State is violent, there will be counter-violence' Revolutionary poet and ideologue Varavara Rao How do you react when Maoists enact a brutal massacre such as this? It is only the symptom of what is happening on the ground. The issue is simple. Multinationals are making huge inroads with the help of corrupt governments and contractors. The Maoists' movement had stopped the mnc drain on the region's resources, but of late they have begun to exploit the area again. In addition, the government is repressing people in the name of Salva Judum, which is nothing but a State-sponsored war upon the people. The media has reported more than 50 policemen killed in the incident, but do you know 39 of them were Salva Judum activists whom the government has armed and given uniforms? 'The government is repressing people in the name of Salva Judum, which is a State-sponsored war' Do you justify violence as a political tactic, though? What is the option? You must ask this question to the State which is the main instrument of violence today. Those who stand up for the rights of the masses often have no recourse but to resist State violence; Maoists are indulging in counter-violence, that's all, they have to defend themselves. Is there a possibility they could give up arms and begin talks? Again, ask the State. If it ends Salva Judum and the people of the area are allowed to return home safe, there will be a reduction in violence. But if the State continues to oppress people, there will be retaliation. How do you respond to a ceasefire proposal? Let the government declare it, the revolutionary movement will take a decision. More than 60 people were killed in Nandigram by the State and nobody calls that violence. These were people trying to protect their land and the police just butchered them. There is no outcry about that kind of violence. Why? When the State is so violent, there will be violence in society. Where do you see the movement heading? Is there a goal in sight? This is a time for all revolutionary, democratic and nationality movements, like the ones in Kashmir and the Northeast to unite, and something will come out of this unity. We have very little expectations of the State and the comprador class that it represents. Sankarshan Thakur Mar 31 , 2007 _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
